The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Elliott, Larry Bill v. Warden (ORDER)
No. 050573Supreme Court of Virginia
050573 Elliott, Larry Bill v. Warden (ORDER) 11/02/2007 Upon consideration of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, respondent's motion to dismiss the petition is granted. Petitioner's claims alleging violat…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
050573 Elliott, Larry Bill v. Warden (ORDER) 11/02/2007 Upon consideration of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, respondent'…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Nov 2, 2007
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
050573 Elliott, Larry Bill v. Warden (ORDER) 11/02/2007 Upon consideration of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, respondent's motion to dismiss the petition is granted. Petitioner's claims alleging violations of the Commonwealth's obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) are rejected as being without merit, his various claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are rejected as not satisfying the two-pronged test enunciated in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), and his remaining claims are likewise rejected as lacking merit or as being either procedurally barred or improperly raised. See Record # 031610, Elliott, Larry Bill v. Commonwealth, dated 03/05/2004
Open court document ↗Documents and links