The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Commonwealth v. Juares
070479 Commonwealth v. Juares 11/02/2007 A trial court did not err in denying motions for a mistrial and to set aside the verdict in a sexual battery prosecution based on an ex parte communication between the …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
070479 Commonwealth v. Juares 11/02/2007 A trial court did not err in denying motions for a mistrial and to set aside the verdict…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Nov 2, 2007
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
070479 Commonwealth v. Juares 11/02/2007 A trial court did not err in denying motions for a mistrial and to set aside the verdict in a sexual battery prosecution based on an ex parte communication between the jury and court personnel during deliberations. The communication was not presumptively prejudicial as a matter of law because it did not concern matters pending before the jury, and the defendant failed to establish that he was prejudiced by the communication. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the conviction is reinstated.
Open court document ↗