The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Jones v. Brandt
No. 061086Supreme Court of Virginia
061086 Jones v. Brandt 06/08/2007 The circuit court correctly found that an attorney-in-fact had the authority, by virtue of a durable power of attorney under which he acted, to change the beneficiary payable …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
061086 Jones v. Brandt 06/08/2007 The circuit court correctly found that an attorney-in-fact had the authority, by virtue of a du…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jun 8, 2007
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
061086 Jones v. Brandt 06/08/2007 The circuit court correctly found that an attorney-in-fact had the authority, by virtue of a durable power of attorney under which he acted, to change the beneficiary payable upon death of a certificate of deposit belonging to the decedent, his principal. Specific and general authorizations made in the power of attorney, when considered in concert, sufficiently expressed the decedent's intent to confer authority to make a certificate of deposit beneficiary change upon the attorney-in-fact. The judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links