The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Committee of Petitioners v. City of Norfolk
No. 061329Supreme Court of Virginia
061329 Committee of Petitioners v. City of Norfolk 06/08/2007 (Revised 06/22/2007) In proceedings relating to a referendum petition seeking a repeal of four city ordinances, the circuit court did not err in al…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
061329 Committee of Petitioners v. City of Norfolk 06/08/2007 (Revised 06/22/2007) In proceedings relating to a referendum petiti…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jun 8, 2007
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
061329 Committee of Petitioners v. City of Norfolk 06/08/2007 (Revised 06/22/2007) In proceedings relating to a referendum petition seeking a repeal of four city ordinances, the circuit court did not err in allowing a city and a redevelopment authority to intervene, but erred in concluding that the petition did not comply with the requirements of the referendum process. The petition was not invalid because it listed more than one challenged ordinance and separate petitions for each challenged ordinance were not required. That portion of the judgment holding that the petition was invalid is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Open court document ↗Documents and links