The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
W. R. Hall v. Hampton Roads Sanitation District
No. 060717Supreme Court of Virginia
060717 W. R. Hall v. Hampton Roads Sanitation District 03/02/2007 Contractual indemnification provisions are not void as against public policy insofar as they entitle an indemnitee to be reimbursed by an indem…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
060717 W. R. Hall v. Hampton Roads Sanitation District 03/02/2007 Contractual indemnification provisions are not void as against …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Mar 2, 2007
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
060717 W. R. Hall v. Hampton Roads Sanitation District 03/02/2007 Contractual indemnification provisions are not void as against public policy insofar as they entitle an indemnitee to be reimbursed by an indemnitor for costs and expenses incurred in the defense of a personal injury claim by a third party. Accordingly, the trial court correctly ruled that the indemnity provisions in a construction contract were enforceable. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links