The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Estes Express Lines v. Chopper Express, Inc.
No. 061302Supreme Court of Virginia
061302 Estes Express Lines v. Chopper Express, Inc. 03/02/2007 An indemnity provision in a vehicle lease agreement is not void as against public policy insofar as it would entitle a party to indemnification fo…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
061302 Estes Express Lines v. Chopper Express, Inc. 03/02/2007 An indemnity provision in a vehicle lease agreement is not void as…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Mar 2, 2007
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
061302 Estes Express Lines v. Chopper Express, Inc. 03/02/2007 An indemnity provision in a vehicle lease agreement is not void as against public policy insofar as it would entitle a party to indemnification for liability incurred as the result of personal injuries caused by its own negligence. Thus, the trial court erred in ruling that such an indemnity provision is unenforceable, and in sustaining a demurrer for that reason. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Open court document ↗Documents and links