The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Sullivan v. Robertson Drug Co.
060647 Sullivan v. Robertson Drug Co. 01/12/2007 (Revised 01/26/2007) In a physician's contribution action against a pharmacist and his employer following the physician's settlement of a malpractice claim, the…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
060647 Sullivan v. Robertson Drug Co. 01/12/2007 (Revised 01/26/2007) In a physician's contribution action against a pharmacist a…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jan 12, 2007
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
060647 Sullivan v. Robertson Drug Co. 01/12/2007 (Revised 01/26/2007) In a physician's contribution action against a pharmacist and his employer following the physician's settlement of a malpractice claim, the trial court erred in giving jury instructions suggesting that the pharmacist could not be found liable for the whole, indivisible injury caused by prescribed medications he had dispensed, permitting the jury to apportion damages based on relative degrees of the parties' negligence, and by submitting the reasonableness of the settlement to the jury where the pharmacist failed to present evidence that it was unreasonable or excessive. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded fo…
Open court document ↗