The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Ulloa v. QSP, Inc.
No. 050095Supreme Court of Virginia
050095 Ulloa v. QSP, Inc. 01/13/2006 In an action for misappropriation of confidential business information in violation of an employment contract, the trial court did not err in determining that the employer …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
050095 Ulloa v. QSP, Inc. 01/13/2006 In an action for misappropriation of confidential business information in violation of an em…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jan 13, 2006
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
050095 Ulloa v. QSP, Inc. 01/13/2006 In an action for misappropriation of confidential business information in violation of an employment contract, the trial court did not err in determining that the employer was entitled to attorneys' fees in connection with its breach of contract claim, but erred in awarding fees for services performed with respect to other claims not relating to the contract. The judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case is remanded for reconsideration of the amount of the attorneys' fee award.
Open court document ↗Documents and links