Skip to page content
V★TE FILESUnited States edition
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC

Sexton v. Cornett

No. 050643Supreme Court of Virginia

050643 Sexton v. Cornett 01/13/2006 Code §§ 51.1-124.4, 51.1-510 and 38.2-3339, which exempt certain life insurance proceeds and vested retirement benefits from legal process, remain in effect as exceptions to…

Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The movement

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The proof

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

050643 Sexton v. Cornett 01/13/2006 Code §§ 51.1-124.4, 51.1-510 and 38.2-3339, which exempt certain life insurance proceeds and …

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
First seen
Oct 4, 2026
Last entry
Jan 13, 2006
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

050643 Sexton v. Cornett 01/13/2006 Code §§ 51.1-124.4, 51.1-510 and 38.2-3339, which exempt certain life insurance proceeds and vested retirement benefits from legal process, remain in effect as exceptions to the application of the more recently enacted augmented estate laws. Thus the rights of beneficiaries of a decedent's Virginia Retirement System life insurance and retirement benefits are unaffected by the augmented estate laws. In a contested estate case, those exempt assets did not become a part of the augmented estate, and their value should not be added to it. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Open court document ↗