The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Sexton v. Cornett
050643 Sexton v. Cornett 01/13/2006 Code §§ 51.1-124.4, 51.1-510 and 38.2-3339, which exempt certain life insurance proceeds and vested retirement benefits from legal process, remain in effect as exceptions to…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
050643 Sexton v. Cornett 01/13/2006 Code §§ 51.1-124.4, 51.1-510 and 38.2-3339, which exempt certain life insurance proceeds and …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jan 13, 2006
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
050643 Sexton v. Cornett 01/13/2006 Code §§ 51.1-124.4, 51.1-510 and 38.2-3339, which exempt certain life insurance proceeds and vested retirement benefits from legal process, remain in effect as exceptions to the application of the more recently enacted augmented estate laws. Thus the rights of beneficiaries of a decedent's Virginia Retirement System life insurance and retirement benefits are unaffected by the augmented estate laws. In a contested estate case, those exempt assets did not become a part of the augmented estate, and their value should not be added to it. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Open court document ↗