The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Safeway, Inc. v. DPI Midatlantic, Inc.
No. 042656Supreme Court of Virginia
042656 Safeway, Inc. v. DPI Midatlantic, Inc. 09/16/2005 The exclusivity provision of the Virginia Workers' Compensation Act, Code § 65.2-307, does not invalidate an express indemnity agreement between an empl…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
042656 Safeway, Inc. v. DPI Midatlantic, Inc. 09/16/2005 The exclusivity provision of the Virginia Workers' Compensation Act, Cod…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Sep 16, 2005
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
042656 Safeway, Inc. v. DPI Midatlantic, Inc. 09/16/2005 The exclusivity provision of the Virginia Workers' Compensation Act, Code § 65.2-307, does not invalidate an express indemnity agreement between an employer and a third party, nor do any provisions of the Act prohibit parties from entering into such an agreement. The circuit court therefore erred in sustaining an employer's plea in bar based on such a provision and in dismissing the third party plaintiff's motion for judgment asserting claims arising under the indemnity agreement. The judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Open court document ↗Documents and links