The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Amstutz v. Everett Jones Lumber Corp.
No. 040134Supreme Court of Virginia
040134 Amstutz v. Everett Jones Lumber Corp. 11/05/2004 In two collected suits involving asserted prescriptive easement rights over a roadway on private land, there was not credible evidence to support the cir…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
040134 Amstutz v. Everett Jones Lumber Corp. 11/05/2004 In two collected suits involving asserted prescriptive easement rights ov…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Nov 5, 2004
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
040134 Amstutz v. Everett Jones Lumber Corp. 11/05/2004 In two collected suits involving asserted prescriptive easement rights over a roadway on private land, there was not credible evidence to support the circuit court finding that a lumber company and an adjoining landowner had established such an easement under the clear and convincing evidence standard. Use of the roadway was not of sufficient continuity to give notice to the owners of the putative servient tenement that an easement was being exercised for agricultural, forestry, timbering or logging purposes. The judgment of the circuit court granting the prescriptive easement is reversed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links