The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Commonwealth v. Hicks
No. 011728Supreme Court of Virginia
011728 Commonwealth v. Hicks 04/23/2004 (Revised 05/18/2004) In a proceeding remanded from the United States Supreme Court, it is held that a redevelopment and housing authority's trespass policy is not void f…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
011728 Commonwealth v. Hicks 04/23/2004 (Revised 05/18/2004) In a proceeding remanded from the United States Supreme Court, it is…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Apr 23, 2004
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
011728 Commonwealth v. Hicks 04/23/2004 (Revised 05/18/2004) In a proceeding remanded from the United States Supreme Court, it is held that a redevelopment and housing authority's trespass policy is not void for vagueness under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and that the authority's policy does not violate a defendant's right of intimate association guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and final judgment is entered affirming the defendant's trespass conviction. (See Record No. 011728, Commonwealth v. Hicks, dated 6/7/2002).
Open court document ↗Docket entry
011728 Commonwealth v. Hicks 06/07/2002 A trespass conviction is reversed because a public redevelopment and housing authority's trespass policy is overly broad and infringes upon First and Fourteenth Amendment protections and this defendant charged with trespass may assert the constitutional challenge in the criminal prosecution. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed in part and vacated in part, and final judgment is entered. See Record #011728, Commonwealth v. Hicks, dated April 23, 2004
Open court document ↗Documents and links