The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Washington v. United Parcel Service
030637 Washington v. United Parcel Service 03/05/2004 In a workers' compensation appeal, the Court of Appeals erred in addressing an issue of causal connection that was not properly before that court and not p…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
030637 Washington v. United Parcel Service 03/05/2004 In a workers' compensation appeal, the Court of Appeals erred in addressing…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Mar 5, 2004
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
030637 Washington v. United Parcel Service 03/05/2004 In a workers' compensation appeal, the Court of Appeals erred in addressing an issue of causal connection that was not properly before that court and not properly before the Commission. As a result, there was no basis for concluding that the claimant would be unjustly enriched by receiving benefits to which he was not entitled. A prior award of benefits remains valid, and the refusal to assess a 20% penalty was error. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings. (Revised 3/8/04)
Open court document ↗