The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
River Heights v. Batten
No. 030180Supreme Court of Virginia
030180 River Heights v. Batten 01/16/2004 (Revised 07/01/2004) The trial court correctly held that owners of lots in a subdivision sufficiently showed a justiciable controversy under Virginia's declaratory jud…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
030180 River Heights v. Batten 01/16/2004 (Revised 07/01/2004) The trial court correctly held that owners of lots in a subdivisio…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jan 16, 2004
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
030180 River Heights v. Batten 01/16/2004 (Revised 07/01/2004) The trial court correctly held that owners of lots in a subdivision sufficiently showed a justiciable controversy under Virginia's declaratory judgment statutes, and correctly determined that a restrictive covenant prohibiting commercial use of certain lots within the subdivision was not rendered unenforceable, either as the result of a plat note restricting access to the lots if they were to be put to residential uses, or as the result of changed conditions. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links