The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Wilkins v. Peninsula Motor Cars
022983 Wilkins v. Peninsula Motor Cars 10/31/2003 The trial court erred in requiring the plaintiff in an action under the Virginia Consumer Protection Act against a car dealership to elect between remedies aft…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
022983 Wilkins v. Peninsula Motor Cars 10/31/2003 The trial court erred in requiring the plaintiff in an action under the Virgini…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Oct 31, 2003
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
022983 Wilkins v. Peninsula Motor Cars 10/31/2003 The trial court erred in requiring the plaintiff in an action under the Virginia Consumer Protection Act against a car dealership to elect between remedies after a jury awarded recovery under the Act as well as a common law fraud count, and awarded both enhanced and punitive damages. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded.
Open court document ↗