The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Lovitt v. Warden
012663 Lovitt v. Warden 09/12/2003 In a petition for a writ of habeas corpus by a prisoner convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death, neither the failure of the prosecution to disclose allegedly excul…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
012663 Lovitt v. Warden 09/12/2003 In a petition for a writ of habeas corpus by a prisoner convicted of capital murder and senten…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Sep 12, 2003
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
012663 Lovitt v. Warden 09/12/2003 In a petition for a writ of habeas corpus by a prisoner convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death, neither the failure of the prosecution to disclose allegedly exculpatory information to defense counsel before trial, nor destruction of evidence after the trial, provided any valid basis for habeas corpus relief. Petitioner's claim that his trial counsel were ineffective is also rejected. The petition is dismissed.
Open court document ↗