The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Andrews v. Ring
No. 022434Supreme Court of Virginia
022434 Andrews v. Ring 09/12/2003 In suits against a county's Commonwealth's attorney and a building inspector, the trial court did not err by granting defense motions for summary judgment on claims under Code…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
022434 Andrews v. Ring 09/12/2003 In suits against a county's Commonwealth's attorney and a building inspector, the trial court d…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Sep 12, 2003
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
022434 Andrews v. Ring 09/12/2003 In suits against a county's Commonwealth's attorney and a building inspector, the trial court did not err by granting defense motions for summary judgment on claims under Code §§ 18.2-499 and -500, as well as certain malicious prosecution claims. However, the evidence did not support issuance of a criminal warrant against the chairperson of the county school board, and her malicious prosecution case is remanded for further proceedings. The judgments are affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Open court document ↗Documents and links