The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Pulte Home Corp. v. Parex Inc.
No. 021976Supreme Court of Virginia
021976 Pulte Home Corp. v. Parex Inc. 04/17/2003 The trial court did not err in sustaining a defendant's demurrer to a co-defendant's cross-claim for breach of express warranty because the warranty was not ade…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
021976 Pulte Home Corp. v. Parex Inc. 04/17/2003 The trial court did not err in sustaining a defendant's demurrer to a co-defenda…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Apr 17, 2003
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
021976 Pulte Home Corp. v. Parex Inc. 04/17/2003 The trial court did not err in sustaining a defendant's demurrer to a co-defendant's cross-claim for breach of express warranty because the warranty was not adequately pled and as to a claim for breach of implied warranty because the damages at issue are consequential, and it is not claimed that privity exists between these parties. Indemnity and contribution claims were also properly dismissed. The judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links