The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Forster v. Hall
No. 021086Supreme Court of Virginia
021086 Forster v. Hall 02/28/2003 The chancellor correctly determined that an implied reciprocal negative easement prohibits the placement of "mobile homes" on all lots of a residential subdivision. However th…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
021086 Forster v. Hall 02/28/2003 The chancellor correctly determined that an implied reciprocal negative easement prohibits the …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Feb 28, 2003
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
021086 Forster v. Hall 02/28/2003 The chancellor correctly determined that an implied reciprocal negative easement prohibits the placement of "mobile homes" on all lots of a residential subdivision. However the trial court incorrectly determined that certain structures permanently annexed to the land are not in violation of the restriction imposed by this easement. That judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case is remanded.
Open court document ↗Documents and links