The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Commonwealth v. Bruhn
No. 020774Supreme Court of Virginia
020774 Commonwealth v. Bruhn 11/01/2002 The Court of Appeals of Virginia correctly determined that under Code § 18.2-111, as amended, proof of embezzlement will not sustain a conviction under an indictment cha…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
020774 Commonwealth v. Bruhn 11/01/2002 The Court of Appeals of Virginia correctly determined that under Code § 18.2-111, as amen…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Nov 1, 2002
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
020774 Commonwealth v. Bruhn 11/01/2002 The Court of Appeals of Virginia correctly determined that under Code § 18.2-111, as amended, proof of embezzlement will not sustain a conviction under an indictment charging grand larceny under Code § 18.2-95. The judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links