Skip to page content
V★TE FILESUnited States edition
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC

Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Quillian

No. 021232Supreme Court of Virginia

021232 Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Quillian 11/01/2002 Questions certified by the U.S. District Court concerning Virginia Code § 46.2-1993.67(5) and the restrictions it places on motorcycle manufacturers and distrib…

Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The movement

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The proof

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

021232 Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Quillian 11/01/2002 Questions certified by the U.S. District Court concerning Virginia Code § 46.2-1…

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
First seen
Oct 4, 2026
Last entry
Nov 1, 2002
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

021232 Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Quillian 11/01/2002 Questions certified by the U.S. District Court concerning Virginia Code § 46.2-1993.67(5) and the restrictions it places on motorcycle manufacturers and distributors who wish to establish a new franchise in the Commonwealth are restated and answered. Notice under the statute must be given to any existing franchised dealer in the Commonwealth, and proof of inadequate representation of the product is not statewide, but also not limited to the locality where the new franchised dealer would be located.

Open court document ↗