The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
In Re: Hopeman Brothers Inc.
No. 020518Supreme Court of Virginia
020518 In Re: Hopeman Brothers Inc. 09/18/2002 Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus, the Court is of opinion that the petitioner is not entitled to the issuance of a writ of mandamus because…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
020518 In Re: Hopeman Brothers Inc. 09/18/2002 Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus, the Court is of opinion t…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Sep 18, 2002
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
020518 In Re: Hopeman Brothers Inc. 09/18/2002 Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus, the Court is of opinion that the petitioner is not entitled to the issuance of a writ of mandamus because petitioner failed to establish a clear and specific legal right to be enforced, or a duty which ought to be and can be performed and that there is no other specific and adequate legal remedy. (Published ORDER)
Open court document ↗Documents and links