The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Commonwealth v. Hill
012316 Commonwealth v. Hill 09/13/2002 In a criminal appeal, the Court of Appeals erred in reversing a defendant's conviction on the ground that the trial court refused to permit questions asking prospective j…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
012316 Commonwealth v. Hill 09/13/2002 In a criminal appeal, the Court of Appeals erred in reversing a defendant's conviction on …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Sep 13, 2002
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
012316 Commonwealth v. Hill 09/13/2002 In a criminal appeal, the Court of Appeals erred in reversing a defendant's conviction on the ground that the trial court refused to permit questions asking prospective jurors about the range of punishment that could be imposed upon conviction. Neither the defendant nor the Commonwealth in a non-capital criminal prosecution has a right to ask about such matters during voir dire. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the judgment of the circuit court is reinstated.
Open court document ↗