The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Gelles & Sons General Contracting v. Jeffrey Stack
No. 012319Supreme Court of Virginia
012319 Gelles & Sons General Contracting v. Jeffrey Stack 09/13/2002 The trial court did not commit reversible error in holding that a subcontractor's claim for additional monies due under a construction contr…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
012319 Gelles & Sons General Contracting v. Jeffrey Stack 09/13/2002 The trial court did not commit reversible error in holding t…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Sep 13, 2002
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
012319 Gelles & Sons General Contracting v. Jeffrey Stack 09/13/2002 The trial court did not commit reversible error in holding that a subcontractor's claim for additional monies due under a construction contract was barred by an accord and satisfaction pursuant to Code § 8.3A-311. The trial court's factual determination, that a reasonable person would consider that plaintiff was provided with a "conspicuous statement to the effect that the instrument was tendered as full satisfaction of the claim," was not clearly erroneous, and the judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links