The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Polyzos v. Cotrupi
011778 Polyzos v. Cotrupi 06/07/2002 In an action for negligence and breach of contract against a real estate agent arising from a property sales agreement which required conveyance of a parcel larger than tha…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
011778 Polyzos v. Cotrupi 06/07/2002 In an action for negligence and breach of contract against a real estate agent arising from …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jun 7, 2002
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
011778 Polyzos v. Cotrupi 06/07/2002 In an action for negligence and breach of contract against a real estate agent arising from a property sales agreement which required conveyance of a parcel larger than that which the owners retained the agent to sell, expert testimony was not essential and, therefore, the trial court erred in sustaining a motion to strike and in entering judgment for the agent based on the absence of expert evidence. The judgment is reversed and the case remanded. (Revised 11/26/02)
Open court document ↗