The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Baysden v. Roche
No. 011880Supreme Court of Virginia
011880 Baysden v. Roche 06/07/2002 Plaintiff brought a claim against the defendant for failure to repay a $50,000 loan plaintiff alleges he undertook, pursuant to the parties' oral agreement, to provide funds …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
011880 Baysden v. Roche 06/07/2002 Plaintiff brought a claim against the defendant for failure to repay a $50,000 loan plaintiff …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jun 7, 2002
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
011880 Baysden v. Roche 06/07/2002 Plaintiff brought a claim against the defendant for failure to repay a $50,000 loan plaintiff alleges he undertook, pursuant to the parties' oral agreement, to provide funds to defendant. The trial court improperly granted a motion to strike plaintiff's evidence because, when viewed in the most favorable light, there was sufficient evidence that the parties' agreement was entirely oral and that certain check endorsements were evidence that the contract was performed, not part of a written contract.
Open court document ↗Documents and links