The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Washburn v. Klara
011034 Washburn v. Klara 04/19/2002 The circuit court erred in striking the evidence in a medical tort case tried on theories of battery and exceeding the patient's informed consent because the evidence, inclu…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
011034 Washburn v. Klara 04/19/2002 The circuit court erred in striking the evidence in a medical tort case tried on theories of …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Apr 19, 2002
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
011034 Washburn v. Klara 04/19/2002 The circuit court erred in striking the evidence in a medical tort case tried on theories of battery and exceeding the patient's informed consent because the evidence, including radiology reports, was sufficient to present a factual issue as to whether the defendant surgeon intentionally performed a procedure exceeding the scope of the patient's consent. The judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial on the claim of battery.
Open court document ↗