The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
James v. James
No. 011448Supreme Court of Virginia
011448 James v. James 04/19/2002 Because the trial court entered nonsuit orders and did not vacate or suspend those orders during the 21-day period thereafter, the court lost jurisdiction to take further actio…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
011448 James v. James 04/19/2002 Because the trial court entered nonsuit orders and did not vacate or suspend those orders during…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Apr 19, 2002
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
011448 James v. James 04/19/2002 Because the trial court entered nonsuit orders and did not vacate or suspend those orders during the 21-day period thereafter, the court lost jurisdiction to take further action on pending sanction motions or to enter dismissal of the cases with prejudice. The judgment appealed from is reversed, the nonsuit orders reinstated, and final judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff.
Open court document ↗Documents and links