The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Pocahontas Mining v. Jewell Ridge Coal Corp.
No. 010110Supreme Court of Virginia
010110 Pocahontas Mining v. Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. 01/11/2002 The trial court correctly interpreted a lease provision obligating a coal company that leased certain property for many years to leave intact a fu…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
010110 Pocahontas Mining v. Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. 01/11/2002 The trial court correctly interpreted a lease provision obligating…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jan 11, 2002
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
010110 Pocahontas Mining v. Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. 01/11/2002 The trial court correctly interpreted a lease provision obligating a coal company that leased certain property for many years to leave intact a functional preparation plant at the end of the lease. The trial court's judgment is affirmed with a modification: if an action for breach of contract is commenced, any damages shall be determined as of the final termination date of the lease, not the date operation of the plant ceased.
Open court document ↗Documents and links