The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Velazquez v. Commonwealth
No. 010926Supreme Court of Virginia
010926 Velazquez v. Commonwealth 01/11/2002 In this appeal of a conviction for rape, the trial court did not err in permitting a sexual assault nurse examiner to testify regarding her expert medical opinion on…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
010926 Velazquez v. Commonwealth 01/11/2002 In this appeal of a conviction for rape, the trial court did not err in permitting a …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jan 11, 2002
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
010926 Velazquez v. Commonwealth 01/11/2002 In this appeal of a conviction for rape, the trial court did not err in permitting a sexual assault nurse examiner to testify regarding her expert medical opinion on the causation of the victim's injuries. However, the examiner's opinion testimony improperly invaded the province of the jury on the ultimate issue of fact. The judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case is remanded. (Opinion edited at p. 15, citation 1/30/02)
Open court document ↗Documents and links