The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Bloom v. Commonwealth
No. 010600Supreme Court of Virginia
010600 Bloom v. Commonwealth 11/02/2001 In a case involving an attempt to take indecent liberties with a child and solicitation to commit sodomy, the trial court did not err in admitting into evidence certain …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
010600 Bloom v. Commonwealth 11/02/2001 In a case involving an attempt to take indecent liberties with a child and solicitation t…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Nov 2, 2001
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
010600 Bloom v. Commonwealth 11/02/2001 In a case involving an attempt to take indecent liberties with a child and solicitation to commit sodomy, the trial court did not err in admitting into evidence certain out-of-court statements where the defendant was sufficiently identified as the person who had made the statements via the Internet. The judgment of the Court of Appeals upholding the trial court's ruling is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links