The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Fritts v. Carolinas Cement Co.
No. 002120Supreme Court of Virginia
002120 Fritts v. Carolinas Cement Co. 09/14/2001 The trial court did not err in holding that a cement company's proposed cement and flyash terminal is a warehousing and distribution facility permitted by right…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
002120 Fritts v. Carolinas Cement Co. 09/14/2001 The trial court did not err in holding that a cement company's proposed cement a…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Sep 14, 2001
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
002120 Fritts v. Carolinas Cement Co. 09/14/2001 The trial court did not err in holding that a cement company's proposed cement and flyash terminal is a warehousing and distribution facility permitted by right under a county zoning ordinance, and the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links