Skip to page content
V★TE FILESUnited States edition
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC

Virginia Retirement System v. Avery

No. 002253Supreme Court of Virginia

002253 Virginia Retirement System v. Avery 09/14/2001 Since service of process upon an opposing party is not a requirement for perfecting appeal of an administrative agency's decision, the circuit court had ju…

Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The movement

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The proof

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

002253 Virginia Retirement System v. Avery 09/14/2001 Since service of process upon an opposing party is not a requirement for pe…

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
First seen
Oct 4, 2026
Last entry
Sep 14, 2001
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

002253 Virginia Retirement System v. Avery 09/14/2001 Since service of process upon an opposing party is not a requirement for perfecting appeal of an administrative agency's decision, the circuit court had jurisdiction and the savings statute cures any defective service on the facts of this case, the Court of Appeals correctly affirmed the trial court's rulings, and that judgment is affirmed.

Open court document ↗