The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Kidd v. Gunter
No. 002420Supreme Court of Virginia
002420 Kidd v. Gunter 09/14/2001 The trial court correctly held that even though a decedent clearly had testamentary intent in creating a journal, she did not make it manifest that her name on the inside cover…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
002420 Kidd v. Gunter 09/14/2001 The trial court correctly held that even though a decedent clearly had testamentary intent in cr…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Sep 14, 2001
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
002420 Kidd v. Gunter 09/14/2001 The trial court correctly held that even though a decedent clearly had testamentary intent in creating a journal, she did not make it manifest that her name on the inside cover was intended as a signature to the writing. The journal therefore did not satisfy the requirements for a holographic will. The judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links