The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Grimes v. Suzukawa
No. 002536Supreme Court of Virginia
002536 Grimes v. Suzukawa 09/14/2001 A plaintiff who alleged intentional tort causes of action against defendant arising from a masked, sexual assault, was not entitled to rely upon the tolling provision of Co…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
002536 Grimes v. Suzukawa 09/14/2001 A plaintiff who alleged intentional tort causes of action against defendant arising from a m…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Sep 14, 2001
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
002536 Grimes v. Suzukawa 09/14/2001 A plaintiff who alleged intentional tort causes of action against defendant arising from a masked, sexual assault, was not entitled to rely upon the tolling provision of Code § 8.01-229(D) when the assailant's identity was learned several years later. Since she did not establish that defendant undertook any affirmative act, directly or indirectly, to obstruct her right to file an action, and the judgment of the trial court dismissing the motion for judgment with prejudice is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links