The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Beck v. Smith
No. 992904Supreme Court of Virginia
992904 Beck v. Smith 11/03/2000 The trial court erred concluding that buyers of property could not prevail on a breach of contract claim because the terms of the contract for sale were merged into the deed, bu…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
992904 Beck v. Smith 11/03/2000 The trial court erred concluding that buyers of property could not prevail on a breach of contrac…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Nov 3, 2000
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
992904 Beck v. Smith 11/03/2000 The trial court erred concluding that buyers of property could not prevail on a breach of contract claim because the terms of the contract for sale were merged into the deed, but correctly ruled that they could not recover for fraud because a title examination would have disclosed the facts. Judgment on the contract claim is reversed, the jury verdict awarding the plaintiffs compensatory and consequential damages for the contract claim is reinstated, and dismissal of the fraud claim is affirmed. (Opinion revised 11/8/00)
Open court document ↗Documents and links