The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Peterson v. Castano
No. 992478Supreme Court of Virginia
992478 Peterson v. Castano 09/15/2000 The circuit court erred in denying a plaintiff's motion to amend two motions for judgment arising from a motor vehicle accident to increase each ad damnum clause. The port…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
992478 Peterson v. Castano 09/15/2000 The circuit court erred in denying a plaintiff's motion to amend two motions for judgment a…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Sep 15, 2000
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
992478 Peterson v. Castano 09/15/2000 The circuit court erred in denying a plaintiff's motion to amend two motions for judgment arising from a motor vehicle accident to increase each ad damnum clause. The portion of the judgment holding defendants liable is affirmed, while that portion assessing plaintiff's damages is reversed. The proceedings are remanded with directions to permit plaintiff to amend the motions for judgment to increase each ad damnum clause, and on remand, the plaintiff will be entitled to a trial on the issue of damages only.
Open court document ↗Documents and links