The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Musselman v. The Glass Works
No. 992887Supreme Court of Virginia
992887 Musselman v. The Glass Works 09/15/2000 The trial court erred in holding that the death of a party to a non- competition agreement, executed as part of the sale of a business, relieved the purchaser of …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
992887 Musselman v. The Glass Works 09/15/2000 The trial court erred in holding that the death of a party to a non- competition a…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Sep 15, 2000
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
992887 Musselman v. The Glass Works 09/15/2000 The trial court erred in holding that the death of a party to a non- competition agreement, executed as part of the sale of a business, relieved the purchaser of the business of its obligation to make payments under the agreement. That judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for entry of judgment, in favor of plaintiff executor of the individual seller's estate, for the full amount due under the non-competition agreement.
Open court document ↗Documents and links