The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Feddeman & Company v. Langan Associates P.C.
No. 991996Supreme Court of Virginia
991996 Feddeman & Company v. Langan Associates P.C. 06/09/2000 In a case in which an aborted corporate buy-out or merger was followed by mass resignation of plaintiff's employees, the evidence was sufficient t…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
991996 Feddeman & Company v. Langan Associates P.C. 06/09/2000 In a case in which an aborted corporate buy-out or merger was foll…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jun 9, 2000
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
991996 Feddeman & Company v. Langan Associates P.C. 06/09/2000 In a case in which an aborted corporate buy-out or merger was followed by mass resignation of plaintiff's employees, the evidence was sufficient to support a jury determination that defendants knew and intended that their resignation plan would injure plaintiff. The trial court erred in setting the verdict aside, and that judgment is reversed. Because the trial court did not consider an award in accordance with § 18.2-500, the case is remanded for entry of a judgment consistent with this opinion.
Open court document ↗Documents and links