The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Jett v. DeGaetani
No. 991589Supreme Court of Virginia
991589 Jett v. DeGaetani 04/21/2000 A judgment which ordered specific performance of an oral agreement is unenforceable because a person to whom the chancellor ordered the defendants to convey an interest in r…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
991589 Jett v. DeGaetani 04/21/2000 A judgment which ordered specific performance of an oral agreement is unenforceable because a…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Apr 21, 2000
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
991589 Jett v. DeGaetani 04/21/2000 A judgment which ordered specific performance of an oral agreement is unenforceable because a person to whom the chancellor ordered the defendants to convey an interest in real property is not a party to this litigation. It was not practically impossible to join the former wife as a party, and her interests were not separable from the plaintiff's interests to the extent that the chancellor could enter an order without prejudice to her rights. The chancellor's order is reversed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links