Skip to page content
V★TE FILESUnited States edition
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC

Mark Turner v. Commonwealth

No. 991630Supreme Court of Virginia

991630 Mark Turner v. Commonwealth 04/21/2000 In an appeal of two related criminal convictions, the trial court's rulings on the defendant's motion for a new trial were not erroneous (1) in failing to find tha…

Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The movement

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The proof

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

991630 Mark Turner v. Commonwealth 04/21/2000 In an appeal of two related criminal convictions, the trial court's rulings on the …

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
First seen
Oct 4, 2026
Last entry
Apr 21, 2000
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

991630 Mark Turner v. Commonwealth 04/21/2000 In an appeal of two related criminal convictions, the trial court's rulings on the defendant's motion for a new trial were not erroneous (1) in failing to find that there was a conflict of interest in defense counsel's representation of the defendant and (2) in excluding the defendant's evidence of allegedly inadequate representation. The judgment is affirmed.

Open court document ↗