The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Mark Turner v. Commonwealth
991630 Mark Turner v. Commonwealth 04/21/2000 In an appeal of two related criminal convictions, the trial court's rulings on the defendant's motion for a new trial were not erroneous (1) in failing to find tha…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
991630 Mark Turner v. Commonwealth 04/21/2000 In an appeal of two related criminal convictions, the trial court's rulings on the …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Apr 21, 2000
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
991630 Mark Turner v. Commonwealth 04/21/2000 In an appeal of two related criminal convictions, the trial court's rulings on the defendant's motion for a new trial were not erroneous (1) in failing to find that there was a conflict of interest in defense counsel's representation of the defendant and (2) in excluding the defendant's evidence of allegedly inadequate representation. The judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗