The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
National Fruit Product Co. v. Staton
No. 990428Supreme Court of Virginia
990428 National Fruit Product Co. v. Staton 03/03/2000 For the reasons expressed by the Court of Appeals in National Fruit Product Co. v. Staton, 28 Va. App. 650, 507 S.E.2d 667 (1998), there was no error in d…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
990428 National Fruit Product Co. v. Staton 03/03/2000 For the reasons expressed by the Court of Appeals in National Fruit Produc…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Mar 3, 2000
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
990428 National Fruit Product Co. v. Staton 03/03/2000 For the reasons expressed by the Court of Appeals in National Fruit Product Co. v. Staton, 28 Va. App. 650, 507 S.E.2d 667 (1998), there was no error in determining that uncontradicted opinion testimony expressed as a "high probability" of causation is sufficient to support a finding by "clear and convincing evidence (not a mere probability)" within the context of Code § 65.2-401.
Open court document ↗Documents and links