The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Norfolk Beverage Company v. Cho
No. 990528Supreme Court of Virginia
990528 Norfolk Beverage Company v. Cho 03/03/2000 In this appeal of judgments entered in consolidated tort actions, the jury's verdicts were not excessive and the circuit court did not err by permitting an exp…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
990528 Norfolk Beverage Company v. Cho 03/03/2000 In this appeal of judgments entered in consolidated tort actions, the jury's ve…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Mar 3, 2000
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
990528 Norfolk Beverage Company v. Cho 03/03/2000 In this appeal of judgments entered in consolidated tort actions, the jury's verdicts were not excessive and the circuit court did not err by permitting an expert witness to render an opinion that certain medical expenses that the plaintiffs incurred were related to their injuries. The judgments of the circuit court are affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links