The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Keesee v. Donigan
990181 Keesee v. Donigan 01/14/2000 The trial court abused its discretion in an automobile crash negligence case in allowing an accident reconstruction expert to testify concerning "average" driver perception …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
990181 Keesee v. Donigan 01/14/2000 The trial court abused its discretion in an automobile crash negligence case in allowing an a…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jan 14, 2000
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
990181 Keesee v. Donigan 01/14/2000 The trial court abused its discretion in an automobile crash negligence case in allowing an accident reconstruction expert to testify concerning "average" driver perception and reaction times absent evidence that a party fell within the average range. This error was not harmless. The trial court's judgment is reversed, and the case remanded for a new trial.
Open court document ↗