The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Black v. Bladergroen
No. 990065Supreme Court of Virginia
990065 Black v. Bladergroen 11/05/1999 In a medical malpractice case, the trial court erred in excluding testimony of a medical expert called by the plaintiff. The judgment is reversed.
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
990065 Black v. Bladergroen 11/05/1999 In a medical malpractice case, the trial court erred in excluding testimony of a medical e…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Nov 5, 1999
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
990065 Black v. Bladergroen 11/05/1999 In a medical malpractice case, the trial court erred in excluding testimony of a medical expert called by the plaintiff. The judgment is reversed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links