The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
VEPCO v. Dungee
982485 VEPCO v. Dungee 09/17/1999 In a personal injury case in which a ten-year-old boy received severe burns after crawling through a fence into an electric power substation, in view of the evidence in the re…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
982485 VEPCO v. Dungee 09/17/1999 In a personal injury case in which a ten-year-old boy received severe burns after crawling thro…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Sep 17, 1999
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
982485 VEPCO v. Dungee 09/17/1999 In a personal injury case in which a ten-year-old boy received severe burns after crawling through a fence into an electric power substation, in view of the evidence in the record, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the jury's verdict was not excessive. Accordingly, the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to set the verdict aside or order remittitur is affirmed.
Open court document ↗