The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Motley v. Tarmac
No. 982018Supreme Court of Virginia
982018 Motley v. Tarmac 06/11/1999 The circuit court erred in denying a plaintiff's post-trial motion for a new trial because the corporate defendant designated as its agent, for purposes of Code § 8.01-375, a…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
982018 Motley v. Tarmac 06/11/1999 The circuit court erred in denying a plaintiff's post-trial motion for a new trial because the…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jun 11, 1999
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
982018 Motley v. Tarmac 06/11/1999 The circuit court erred in denying a plaintiff's post-trial motion for a new trial because the corporate defendant designated as its agent, for purposes of Code § 8.01-375, a former employee whose negligence was at issue in the litigation, thus permitting the former employee to observe the trial even though the circuit court had excluded witnesses. The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the case remanded for a new trial.
Open court document ↗Documents and links