The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Brooks & Company v. Randy Robinson Contracting
No. 980953Supreme Court of Virginia
980953 Brooks & Company v. Randy Robinson Contracting 02/26/1999 Because the trial court correctly found that the parties had an oral agreement for performance of certain construction work, and that a written …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
980953 Brooks & Company v. Randy Robinson Contracting 02/26/1999 Because the trial court correctly found that the parties had an …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Feb 26, 1999
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
980953 Brooks & Company v. Randy Robinson Contracting 02/26/1999 Because the trial court correctly found that the parties had an oral agreement for performance of certain construction work, and that a written contract was never agreed to by the parties, and thus that there was no agreement to submit disputes to arbitration, the judgment entering a stay of arbitration is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links