The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Bayliner Marine Corporation v. Crow
No. 980392Supreme Court of Virginia
980392 Bayliner Marine Corporation v. Crow 01/08/1999 Because there was not sufficient evidence to support the trial court's ruling that the manufacturer of a sport fishing boat breached express and implied wa…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
980392 Bayliner Marine Corporation v. Crow 01/08/1999 Because there was not sufficient evidence to support the trial court's ruli…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jan 8, 1999
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
980392 Bayliner Marine Corporation v. Crow 01/08/1999 Because there was not sufficient evidence to support the trial court's ruling that the manufacturer of a sport fishing boat breached express and implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, the trial court's judgment is reversed and final judgment is entered for the manufacturer.
Open court document ↗Documents and links