The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Martone v. Martone
No. 980558Supreme Court of Virginia
980558 Martone v. Martone 01/08/1999 Because some of the proponents of a decedent's prior will had a mere expectancy under that will and not a legally ascertainable, pecuniary interest, they are not "person[s]…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
980558 Martone v. Martone 01/08/1999 Because some of the proponents of a decedent's prior will had a mere expectancy under that w…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jan 8, 1999
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
980558 Martone v. Martone 01/08/1999 Because some of the proponents of a decedent's prior will had a mere expectancy under that will and not a legally ascertainable, pecuniary interest, they are not "person[s] interested" as that term is used in Code § 64.1-90. The judgment of the circuit court dismissing their suit is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links